Office of Major Scholarship Advisement

Letters of Recommendation

1) Approach potential recommenders first as advisers.Letters of Recommendation

  • Get to know your advisers and let them get to know you. Talk about your broader interests and goals.  Ask for their advice about potential projects, reading, courses of study, graduate programs.  These conversations will be very useful in themselves, but they will also help you judge which advisers are likely to be your most enthusiastic recommenders.  Meetings will also allow those whom you choose as recommenders to write informed and more personally engaged letters.

2) Ask someone who knows you well.

  • The individual should be able to discuss in specific detail what distinguishes you.

3) Ask well in advance of the deadline.

  • Asking three to four weeks in advance should be adequate. It is often beneficial to consult with the recommender to see how much time is needed. This is especially true for letters for major fellowships and ones to be written over the summer.

4) Ask: "Do you feel you know me (or my academic record, my leadership qualities) well
    enough to write a strong letter of recommendation for the X scholarship?"

  • You have now given the adviser the chance to decline gracefully.  If the answer is "no," don't push. You can make this inquiry via email if you already have an established relationship with the potential recommender.

5) Schedule an appointment with your recommenders

  • This is needed to discuss the scholarship, its selection criteria, your most recent and commendable activities, and to suggest what each recommender might emphasize. (You may want to let your recommenders know who your other recommenders are, so that they can write letters that complement rather than repeat one another).

6) Bring to the meeting:

  1. A current resume or a list of your activities and honors. Include internships or work/research experience, community service, conference papers/presentations, and other creative or leadership experiences.
  2. A copy of your personal statement, project proposal, and/or course of study proposal, or other descriptive information from the application (possibly including information about career plans, foreign travel experience, or non-academic interests that is sometimes requested).  If these materials are not yet completed, you need to provide an informal version in the form of a 1-2 page statement.
  3. Any pertinent reminders about the work you have done for this professor.  These will help you highlight what makes you a strong candidate and may include past papers or exams.
  4. A copy of your transcript (if applying for a nationally competitive fellowship).
    This can be an unofficial copy and is to give your recommender an overview of your academic program to-date as well as your grades. If your grades are not what you think they should be, be ready to identify any extenuating circumstances (for example, family or other responsibilities, number or level of courses taken).
  5. The official description of the criteria the recommender's letter should focus on.  You can provide suggestions as to what you would like your recommender to emphasize.
  6. Any coversheets or official recommendation forms that should accompany the letter. You need to complete any section that pertains to you: name, address to which the letter should be sent, etc. Each scholarship is different. Make sure you have waived your right to access under the Family Rights and Privacy Act. Selection committees often fail to take non-restricted letters seriously.
  7. If you are asking for more than one letter (as for graduate school or multiple fellowships), provide the following information on a separate sheet, as well as stamped and addressed envelopes for each fellowship
  8. To whom each letter should be addressed (individual or committee, relevant titles, address).
  9. Whether each letter should be mailed directly to the funding agency (as in the case of the Rhodes, NSF, Mellon) or remitted to the Office of International Education and Fellowship Programs for inclusion in the application packet (Truman, Goldwater, Udall, Marshall).
  10. The deadline. Be sure to distinguish between a "postmark" and a "received by" due date.

7) Finally, be sure to write your recommenders a note of thanks and let them know what

Adapted from a handout provided by Jane Curlin, Willamette University